No politician is worth dragging the body of Christ into unnecessary political controversy. Is this too much to ask, daddy? – Festus Keyamo replies Cardinal Onaiyekan

Festus Keyamo, the Minister of Labour and Productivity, has responded to the statement made by Cardinal John Onaiyekan, the Bishop Emeritus of the Archdiocese of Abuja. Onaiyekan recently expressed his opinion during an interview with Channels TV that it is not reasonable to inaugurate elected officials when their electoral victories are being contested in court.

He made this comment in relation to the 2023 presidential election and the announcement of Bola Tinubu as the winner.

Reacting to this, the Minister in a lengthy tweet described the Cardinal’s statement as unstatesmanlike. According to him, because his candidate did not win, the cleric feels humiliated and embarrassed

He further stated that the embarrassment to the Body of Christ is getting too much and no politician is worth dragging this dignified body into unnecessary political controversy

He wrote; ‘’Dear daddy Onaiyekan, you know we all respect you a lot, but your political comments are becoming unstatesmanlike.

A statesman who doubles as a Man of God should strive to be fair to all. You didn’t say the same thing when Obasanjo, Yar’Adua, Jonathan and Buhari were all sworn in as Presidents when their cases were still before the courts. You have chosen to single out this President- Elect

@officialABAT this time around because the candidate you and your other religious brethren openly supported lost the election and you all feel humiliated and embarrassed. All issues raised against the victory of @officialABAT in court now (whether it is 25% votes in FCT or the fake drug issue, etc), are not different from issues raised against previous Presidents-elect because basically the complaints have always been that the declared victor did not win the election fair and square or was not qualified to contest the election. No disqualifying issue against a candidate can be greater than other disqualifying issues since a single issue can decide a case against a President-elect.

So, why all the fuse now? It has always been our electoral template since 1999 for the declared winners to be sworn into office in order TO AVOID A VACUUM and not to foist an unconstitutional contraption on the system whist the cases are in court.

My dear daddy, may I respectfully advise that going forward, you and your brethren may consider stepping back from the deep and murky waters of politics and desist from descending into the arena of political conflicts where your children in your congregations find themselves on different sides of political divides, so it would be unfair to them for you to openly take sides. The embarrassment to the Body of Christ is getting too much and no politician is worth dragging this dignified body into unnecessary political controversy. Is this too much to ask, daddy?”